95 %
Cost plans aligned with design milestones
5 %
Typical variance at each planning gate
100 %
Client satisfaction with cost reporting
Monthly cashflow forecasting reports have long been the default mechanism for managing project liquidity. Typically produced weeks after the month end, these reports provide a retrospective view of spend rather than a real understanding of current or future cash demand. In complex capital programmes, this delay limits decision-making and forces teams to react to conditions that have already changed.
As projects increase in scale, pace, and commercial complexity, static reporting cycles are no longer sufficient. Cashflow forecasting must evolve from a reporting exercise into a live control function.
Traditional monthly cashflow reports introduce structural weaknesses into project controls. By the time figures are compiled, reviewed, and circulated, the data is already outdated. This creates a disconnect between financial planning and on-site reality.
Common limitations include:
For projects operating in volatile markets or accelerated programmes, these gaps materially increase delivery and commercial risk.
Live cashflow forecasting replaces static snapshots with continuously updated models that reflect real project activity. Cash demand evolves in line with progress achieved, procurement events, risk movement, and programme change.
This shift enables:
Rather than waiting for month-end reconciliation, project teams can manage cash proactively as delivery unfolds.
When cashflow forecasting is live and integrated, it becomes a core project control rather than a finance output. Funding decisions are informed by real-time progress, risk exposure, and commercial commitments.
A live approach supports:
This integration transforms cash flow from a passive report into an active lever for delivery control.
Moving to live cashflow forecasting requires structured systems, disciplined governance, and accurate data inputs. It is not a technology issue alone, but an operating model shift.
Effective implementation typically includes:
The objective is not increased reporting frequency, but increased accuracy and relevance.
Static monthly reports will always have a place as historical records. However, they cannot support proactive delivery in fast-moving, capital-intensive environments. Live cashflow forecasting provides the visibility and control required to protect liquidity, maintain momentum, and reduce financial surprise.
For clients delivering complex programmes, the movement away from monthly reporting towards live cashflow forecasting is not simply an efficiency improvement. It is a strategic shift that strengthens cost certainty, supports better commercial outcomes, and underpins predictable project delivery.